Review:The New Rules of Lifting for Women

A couple months ago, while browsing the shelves at my local library, I spied and checked out The New Rules of Lifting by Lou Schuler and Alwyn Cosgrove.  While I absorbed much of the information, finding it helpful for me in figuring out my daily workouts and nutrition, in starting to think about a workout template, I felt at the time that some of the exercises/moves/suggestions may need to be adjusted for women.

I LOVED that the book contained named templates and a series that guided a man through an entire year’s of workouts.  From initial skill-building (the break-in program)  through a fat-loss program and several strength building programs: endurance and muscle building.  Each program was NAMED giving me a clear way to understand why the changed in routines were put there, how each change should impact a workout, and what the goal of that month would be if I were using it.

I was thrilled to see that they were publishing a companion edition of the book that I hoped would fill my needs: The New Rules of Lifting for Women. With the original two authors, they added Cassandra Forsythe to reinforce any changes required between the men’s information/exercises and the women’s.

I LOVE how they have adapted the diet and exercise information for women to include our lower testosterone levels, and how female hormones may effect diet and exercise.   I re-read the section called “Core of Babylon.”  because I think it explains how some of my chronic ache and pains are related and gives a clue about how to reduce their impact their on my life.

I LIKE the photos and demonstrations of different exercises, especially some of the alternatives.

I HATE that the workouts for women are labeled Stage One, Stage Two, etc.  What the heck does Stage one mean?  And why couldn’t the authors simply have equated to the men’s “initial skill” level?  What am I concentrating on in Stage Two?  Is it stability, endurance?

Personally, this feels like a cop-out to me.  Like “women can’t deal” with workout named to conform with exercise regimes like NASMs OPT models. (which I simply chose because I could find it.)  Now I can carefully study the recommended exercises and sequences and likely figure out for myself what the authors were aiming for, but WHY SHOULD I??

With all the respectful, thorough and useful information in this book, why did the authors have to back away from naming their different stages by some kind of function?  I’d love to hear a reason that make me feel condenscended to.


5 responses to “Review:The New Rules of Lifting for Women

  1. I need to finally give in and check the book out.

    Ive stayed away ONLY because I loathe the title.

    Im a mature one—-I know.

  2. I’ve heard about that book — one of my female blog friends liked it and found it helpful. But yeah, if it seems like you’re being condescended to (especially when you compare it to the first book, neither of which I’ve read), that isn’t the best way to go about it.

  3. just checkin on you.

    good weekend?
    not me.
    well the weekend was good but the Toddler? demanding and the HUBBY? traveling…

  4. Did anyone actually do the 6 month program? I have been working out with weights for a year and I have made great progress. I don’t want to go backwards. I would love to find someone who followed the program and see if it made a difference from what they might have already been doing, and someone who is not a beginner.

  5. Pingback: Changin’ It Up « Weight For Deb

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s